Kotter’s research at Harvard Business School, published in Leading Change (1996), analysed over 100 major transformation efforts and identified eight recurring failure patterns. These remain as relevant today as when first documented.
| Issue | What It Looks Like | Prevention Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Insufficient urgency | People do not believe change is truly necessary; complacency | Present compelling data on current performance gap; make the cost of inaction visible |
| Weak coalition | Change is driven by one leader or function; broader buy-in absent | Build a cross-functional guiding coalition with genuine authority and credibility |
| No clear vision | People cannot articulate where the change is going or why | Create a vivid, specific, communicable vision; test it by asking team members to describe it |
| Under-communication | Change is announced once; questions go unanswered | Over-communicate through multiple channels; address resistance directly and repeatedly |
| Obstacles not removed | Systems, structures, or managers block the new behaviours | Identify and eliminate structural barriers; address resistant managers explicitly |
| No short-term wins | People cannot see progress; cynicism grows | Plan and celebrate visible early wins within 6–12 months |
| Declaring victory too early | Pressure eases before new behaviours are embedded | Keep urgency high until new culture is demonstrably self-sustaining |
| Culture not anchored | New ways of working not connected to organisational identity | Explicitly link changes to values; hire and promote based on new cultural standards |
Resistance is not obstruction — it is information. Common sources of resistance include:
Effective change leaders treat resistance as a diagnostic signal rather than a management problem to suppress.
The following section contains our original guide to change management issues and failure factors.
What are the change management issues? In most instances, change management initiatives fail.
The Journal of Change Management in 2002 stated, “Change initiatives crucial to organisational success fail 70% of the time.”
There are many studies which suggest similar statistics. So what change management issues cause this high rate of failure? Kotter, in his book, ‘Force for Change: How Leadership Differs from Management’, lists the following points as the main reasons why change fails:

The bottom line is, change management issues arise because you are dealing with people, and change in people. We all have our own beliefs and values, and we all have to understand change and believe in this. If we don’t see the benefit and vision, then we will simply not want to change and will create natural barriers.
The greater the number of people who don’t want to change, the greater the chance of failure. – Communication, therefore, is crucial. Communicating the vision is doubly imperative.
Change comes from effectively leading cultural change in people. Using a change management plan is crucial, but more importantly, that change management plan must also capture a transition plan.
Most practitioners concentrate solely on developing a Change Management plan and not on the transition plan within the same document. Here are the differences:
•A change management plan – Focuses on the process of change and the tasks needed to successfully complete the project. It starts with the end in mind and works back.
•The Transition plan – focuses on people and culture change, starting on the current culture and looks at how to transition into the new desired state.
Failure to focus on the cultural change side creates a high degree of failure and adds to the list of change management issues in organisational development.
Change cannot be enforced, nor can it be sold. It has to be communicated, nurtured and developed until those affected believe in it and drive it themselves. Not everyone will, but the majority should, given the right environment, and it’s the majority that you want on board to drive the new ways of working and beliefs that will support change.